| Author |
Message |
|
Joined: October 22, 2010
Posts: 311
Submissions: 242
Location: Madison, WI
|
| does anyone recognize this pattern? |
|
| Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:05 pm |
Link to Post:  |
|
does anyone recognize this pattern? if so, can you point me to the site? description: box twist 5 in 1.
|
|
|
GinOokami
 [ Kibitzer ]
Joined: April 21, 2012
Posts: 22
Submissions: 0
Location: Henderson, NV
|
|
|
| Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:10 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
It appears very similar to a Full Persian 4-1, but slightly off. Sorry I can't be of more help D:
~Gin |
|
|
Joined: August 05, 2010
Posts: 177
Submissions: 7
Location: Blacksburg, VA, USA
|
|
|
| Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:19 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
Could be Lady of the House or Brian Buron's Chain.
while(!finished)
project.addRing();
// Maille Code V2.0 T6.2 R5.6 Eo.n Fper MFe.s Wsm Caws G0.8-1.6 I2.4-8.0 N22.20 Pn Dcdjs Xg39w1 S07 |
|
|
Joined: October 22, 2010
Posts: 311
Submissions: 242
Location: Madison, WI
|
|
|
| Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:53 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
no, it's none of these.
|
|
|
Joined: December 22, 2007
Posts: 3600
Submissions: 99
Location: Hampton, Virginia USA
|
|
|
Joined: October 22, 2010
Posts: 311
Submissions: 242
Location: Madison, WI
|
|
|
| Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:58 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
no, it's not that either. this is completely uniform on all sides, twisting, and is a true 5 in 1.
|
|
|
Joined: November 25, 2010
Posts: 701
Submissions: 57
Location: Es-whoy-malth B.C.
|
|
|
Joined: August 14, 2006
Posts: 1798
Submissions: 40
Location: McPherson, Kansas
|
|
|
| Posted on Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:13 am |
Link to Post: |
|
I'll second djgm. I believe it's Persian, not Box.
|
|
|
Joined: October 22, 2010
Posts: 311
Submissions: 242
Location: Madison, WI
|
|
|
| Posted on Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:43 am |
Link to Post: |
|
yes, that's it. thanks. i disagree with the full persian name, but that's okay.
|
|
|
Joined: May 07, 2008
Posts: 3490
Submissions: 147
Location: Germany, Herxheim
|
|
|
| Posted on Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:54 am |
Link to Post: |
|
FP5in1 is one of the possible transitions from Box to FP, so it's Euro AND Persian. Just the 'Full' in the weave name is at least questionable, and maybe 'Persian Box Twist 5in1' would be more appropriate.
And there are other ones, like the example that I just made to show - and some more...
-ZiLi-
Maille Code V2.0 T6.5 R5.6 Ep Fper Mfe.s Ws$ Cpbsw$ G0.4-3.5 I1.6-16.0 N28.25 Pj Dacdejst Xagtw S08 Hi
Human societies are like chain mail.
A single link will be worth nothing.
A chain is of use, but will break at the weakest link.
A weak weave will have the need to replace weak links.
A strong weave will survive even with weak links included.
-'me |
|
|
Joined: August 14, 2006
Posts: 1798
Submissions: 40
Location: McPherson, Kansas
|
|
|
| Posted on Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:08 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
For what it's worth, I'm not sure I really agree with the Full Persian designation after further scrutinization. It does, however have strong Persian roots, although the sheet weave it is derived from is also a Persian European hybrid by current standards.
Edit: And upon further rumination, I'm wondering. I still think both this and the sheet it says it derives from need European as a tag. However, I got to thinking that instead of the 3 Persian seams and one European seam I was thinking, it might be 2 of each. Time to find some rings to play with, I guess.
|
|
|
Joined: March 3, 2002
Posts: 829
Submissions: 243
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:19 am |
Link to Post: |
|
Yes it's two of each. Every ring has persian linkages but not all linkages are persian.
Most weaves on MAIL are misclassified but other than the historical weaves the family groups are a largely irrelevant classification system anyway.
|
|
|
Joined: March 3, 2002
Posts: 4372
Submissions: 79
Location: tres piedras, new mexico
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:48 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
| lorenzo wrote: |
Most weaves on MAIL are misclassified but other than the historical weaves the family groups are a largely irrelevant classification system anyway. |
i feel like the tag system goes a long way toward rectifying this.
PSA: remember to stretch.
3.o is fixing everything. |
|
|
Joined: July 23, 2006
Posts: 2131
Submissions: 95
Location: Standish, Michigan, USA
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:34 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
| ElementalDragon wrote: |
Edit: And upon further rumination, I'm wondering. I still think both this and the sheet it says it derives from need European as a tag. |
Done. 
|
|
|
Joined: August 14, 2006
Posts: 1798
Submissions: 40
Location: McPherson, Kansas
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:04 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
| sakredchao wrote: | | lorenzo wrote: |
Most weaves on MAIL are misclassified but other than the historical weaves the family groups are a largely irrelevant classification system anyway. |
i feel like the tag system goes a long way toward rectifying this. |
It's getting there, and "family" tags can be useful, but I'm not convinced that everything under the sun has to fit into one of the previously defined family groups. But I also don't think a new "family" tag needs to be created for every Tomweave, Dickweave, and Harryweave.
|
|
|
