| Author |
Message |
|
Joined: August 10, 2005
Posts: 7026
Submissions: 294
|
| DEPRECATED ---- MAIL ISSUE POLL - Admin Forum Comments |
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 11:54 am |
Link to Post:  |
|
As has been discussed here and here
I am proposing an official membership vote on the subject of the membership being allowed to comment on Admin Discussions (which normally we can read but not comment on).
The three options will be:
1: all members should be allowed to post in admin discussion threads
2: posting in the admin discussion forum should remain reserved for BOD members only
3: create a forum specifically for BOD and membership to discuss MAIL policies, content and any other MAIL issues
This poll will determine if an official vote on this topic should be scheduled.
[admin note] This Issue Poll has been reposted in order to act in accordance with the Charter [/admin note]
Maille Code
V2.0 T7.3 R5.4 Ep Feur MAg/Cu Wm$ Cbjpw$ G0.5/3.0 I1.5/12.0 N322.150 Pajs Dacdjsw Xa7g631p4t24w64 S88 Hipsu |
|
|
Joined: April 02, 2008
Posts: 1872
Submissions: 28
Location: Lincoln, NE
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:21 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
I did reply yes to this, but I know that it would make BoD discussions more difficult. If there was a way that a thread could run parallel (an exact copy) in another forum where everybody could reply and in the Admin forum it would show by some indication that there was a member comment in between Admin 1 and Admin 2. This would allow the Admins to keep track of admin comments while still knowing that there were comments from the membership that should be viewed in the other thread. Membership could at least put in their 2c. if they wanted to then.
So looking at my response I guess I should have voted yes, in another forum. Oops 
Once you stop learning, you stop living, so...
Ask questions.
Try new things.
Share what you know.
MailleCode V2.0 T5.3 R4.4 E0.0 Feur MFe.sBr Wg Cwb G.7-5.1 I3.1-11 N20.5 Pj Dcdjt Xa1w2 S08 |
|
|
Joined: August 10, 2005
Posts: 7026
Submissions: 294
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:37 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
Good point MM, I think an exact copy forum is a really good idea actually. But those kind of details can be worked out if enough people say yes.
Maille Code
V2.0 T7.3 R5.4 Ep Feur MAg/Cu Wm$ Cbjpw$ G0.5/3.0 I1.5/12.0 N322.150 Pajs Dacdjsw Xa7g631p4t24w64 S88 Hipsu |
|
|
Joined: April 02, 2008
Posts: 1872
Submissions: 28
Location: Lincoln, NE
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:45 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
The only problem with my thought is that I no NOTHING of the coding that would be involved.
Once you stop learning, you stop living, so...
Ask questions.
Try new things.
Share what you know.
MailleCode V2.0 T5.3 R4.4 E0.0 Feur MFe.sBr Wg Cwb G.7-5.1 I3.1-11 N20.5 Pj Dcdjt Xa1w2 S08 |
|
|
Joined: August 30, 2008
Posts: 2590
Submissions: 20
Location: Mississauga, ON, Canada
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 6:31 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
I'm sorry...
I've been keeping an eye on this all day...
Where did the 'Yes, but in a seperate forum' option, with 6 votes go?
|
|
|
Ferd_De_Mann
 [ Grand Master Speaker ]
Joined: March 12, 2006
Posts: 770
Submissions: 9
Location: Wayne, Wv
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 6:31 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
| Daemon_Lotos wrote: | I'm sorry...
I've been keeping an eye on this all day...
Where did the 'Yes, but in a seperate forum' option, with 6 votes go? |
I was thinking the same thing |
|
|
Joined: August 30, 2008
Posts: 2590
Submissions: 20
Location: Mississauga, ON, Canada
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 6:36 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
Wait, scratch that.
I follow what has transpired.
This 'vote' has been turned into a 'mail issue poll' as to whether we should vote or not.
Some of us, who had already voted, are unable to vote again in this revised poll.
|
|
|
Ferd_De_Mann
[ Grand Master Speaker ]
Joined: March 12, 2006
Posts: 770
Submissions: 9
Location: Wayne, Wv
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 6:40 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
| Ahh I see.....so since we already picked an option in the first poll wouldn't that default us to "yes lets put this to a vote"? |
|
|
Joined: August 30, 2008
Posts: 2590
Submissions: 20
Location: Mississauga, ON, Canada
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 6:44 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
No...
Technically, any votes in the first poll constituted an 'I have an opinio and wish to vote on this...'
I'm thinking it might be better to muck this, and repost?
I'll wait for Legba to chime in, however, as the poll is hers.
|
|
|
Joined: January 21, 2004
Posts: 1020
Submissions: 26
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 6:54 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
Editing posts and retconning votes is a bad idea. I agree that this one should be closed and a new poll, with the proper wording be posted.
-phong
|
|
|
Joined: August 10, 2005
Posts: 7026
Submissions: 294
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:25 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
Not edited by me, Blaise edited it maybe he can sort this out. I'll PM him.
As for correct wording Phong, again according to Blasie this is correctly worded.
Maille Code
V2.0 T7.3 R5.4 Ep Feur MAg/Cu Wm$ Cbjpw$ G0.5/3.0 I1.5/12.0 N322.150 Pajs Dacdjsw Xa7g631p4t24w64 S88 Hipsu |
|
|
Joined: January 21, 2004
Posts: 1020
Submissions: 26
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:32 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
I don't doubt that. But people still need to vote on the question they were asked, not on the question that the poll was changed to after the fact. The poll is now how it should be, but the votes do not reflect that. I know you're a stickler for proper vote etiquette, so there shouldn't be an issue.
-phong
|
|
|
Joined: August 10, 2005
Posts: 7026
Submissions: 294
|
|
|
| Posted on Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:45 pm |
Link to Post: |
|
There isn't an issue except that I can't do anything about it myself, I have PMed Blaise.
Maille Code
V2.0 T7.3 R5.4 Ep Feur MAg/Cu Wm$ Cbjpw$ G0.5/3.0 I1.5/12.0 N322.150 Pajs Dacdjsw Xa7g631p4t24w64 S88 Hipsu |
|
|
